THE DISCOVERY DESK · EVERY CLAIM BELOW IS BENCH-PINNED
AI proposes. The attorney disposes. The file proves it.
Discovery drafting, client collection, and production integrity — built so the one rule is enforced in software, not promised in marketing. Every output is a draft package for attorney approval; the finalization gate mints everything that matters; and the record can carry a name because the record proves who decided what, under which rule version, and when.
THREE HONEST SCENES · A SYNTHETIC MATTER
COMPLAINT → GRAPH → RULES SHOWN → CANDIDATES · label: AI PROPOSAL
Synthetic matter: Acme Paving v. Riverbed Holdings
- ✓ Two claims resolve from the reviewed element library — 8 elements, mapped to the numbered allegations
- ✓ The governing rules render VERBATIM with their content hashes — rule-level provenance on every suggestion
- ✓ 70+ purposed candidates generate; the twin 30-caps lint FIRST — overflow is HELD, never silently dropped
BADGE: AI PROPOSAL — nothing serves from this screen; every candidate is a draft package for attorney approval.
A synthetic matter, deterministic checks — reproducible, never simulated. Arrow keys step the scenes; space pauses; reduced-motion starts paused. Legal information, not legal advice.
The defensibility register
What nobody else exposes — each row enforced by the bench, not asserted by this page.
Rule-level provenance
every suggestion carries the governing rule verbatim with its content hash and review state
Rule-change impact into work product
a changed rule moves dependent playbook positions, templates, and drafts to re-review with the diff shown
The limits linter before generation
Florida's twin 30-caps (rogs AND RFAs, including all subparts) lint first — overflow is held, never dropped
The fail-closed privilege gate
an undetermined privilege candidate refuses assembly; nothing exits on a low model score
Cryptographic production defensibility
original and produced hashes, custodian chain, and a reproducible manifest hash that breaks on one changed byte
The approval rail
per-finding approve / reject / revise — no bulk primitive exists in the API at all, and the seven-precondition gate mints every final
Confidentiality-scoped playbooks
a position from one client never surfaces in another client's matter on similarity alone — scope is the gate
The honest ladder
AI proposal → staff draft → attorney reviewed → approved for export — and every working draft leaves watermarked with its state
THE PRICING POSTURE
Priced against the market's flat-rate anchor — with the defensibility layer as the premium.
The market anchors attorney-side discovery drafting at a flat monthly rate per attorney. The Discovery Desk prices against that anchor — and what justifies the premium is everything on this page: the provenance, the gates, the manifest hashes, the record. The consumer rails keep the existing tier ladder on the pricing page. And per the standing rule of this platform: no dollar figure ships before the checkout behind it is real — when billing activates, the number will be as honest as the rest of this page.