Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.460

Motions to Continue Trial

sha256 a806482f987b0bcbc6a56ae6af347cc0… · retrieved 7/11/2026, 11:08:28 AM · The Florida Bar consolidated ed. eff. 04-01-2026 · verified 7/11/2026 by founder-directive-2026-07-11

RULE 1.460. 	MOTIONS TO CONTINUE TRIAL
(a) 	Generally. Motions to continue trial are disfavored and
should rarely be granted and then only upon good cause shown.
Successive continuances are highly disfavored. Lack of due
diligence in preparing for trial is not grounds to continue the case.
Motions for continuance based on parental leave are governed by
Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.570.
(b) 	Motion; Requirements. A motion to continue trial must
be in writing unless made at a trial and, except for good cause
shown, must be signed by the named party requesting the
continuance.
(c) 	Motion; Timing of Filing. A motion to continue trial
must be filed promptly after the appearance of good cause to

support such motion. Failure to promptly request a continuance
may be a basis for denying the motion to continue.
(d) 	Motion; Contents. All motions for continuance, even if
agreed, must state with specificity:
(1) 	the basis of the need for the continuance, including
when the basis became known to the movant;
(2) 	whether the motion is opposed;
(3) 	the action and specific dates for the action that will
enable the movant to be ready for trial by the proposed date,
including, but not limited to, confirming the specific date any
required participants such as third-party witnesses or experts are
available; and
(4) 	the proposed date by which the case will be ready
for trial and whether that date is agreed by all parties.
(e) 	Efforts to Avoid Continuances. To avoid continuances,
trial courts should use all appropriate methods to address the
issues causing delay, including requiring depositions to preserve
testimony, allowing remote appearances, and resolving conflicts
with other judges as provided in the Florida Rules of General
Practice and Judicial Administration.
(f) 	Setting Trial Date. When possible, continued trial dates
must be set in collaboration with attorneys and self-represented
litigants as opposed to the issuance of unilateral dates by the court.
(g) 	Dilatory Conduct. If a continuance is granted based on
the dilatory conduct of an attorney or named party, the court may
impose sanctions on the attorney, the party, or both.
(h) 	Order on Motion for Continuance. When ruling on a
motion to continue, the court must state, either on the record or in
a written order, the factual basis for the ruling. An order granting a
motion to continue must either set a new trial period or set a case
management conference. If the trial is continued, the new trial must

be set for the earliest date practicable, given the needs of the case
and resources of the court. The order must reflect what further
activity will or will not be permitted.
Committee Notes
1980 Amendment. Subdivision (a), deleted by amendment,
was initially adopted when trials were set at a docket sounding
prescribed by statute. Even then, the rule was honored more in the
breach than the observance. Trials are no longer uniformly set in
that manner, and continuances are granted generally without
reference to the rule. Under the revised rule, motions for
continuance can be filed at any time that the need arises and need
not be in writing if the parties are before the court.
1988 Amendment. The supreme court, by adopting Florida
Rule of Judicial Administration 2.085(c), effective July 1, 1986,
required all motions for continuance to be signed by the litigant
requesting the continuance. The amendment conforms rule 1.460
to rule 2.085(c); but, by including an exception for good cause, it
recognizes that circumstances justifying a continuance may excuse
the signature of the party.

Verbatim from the official publication; the only normalization is removal of the publisher's page headers. Verify against the official source for filing-critical use — court publications change without notice.