Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12

Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for

sha256 854881d1dab6d7ba8044703714b3d351… · retrieved 7/16/2026, 2:30:56 PM · Ariz. Supreme Court order-stack reconstruction — R-16-0010 Attachment A + the amendment orders (the committed ledger); clean adopted text, azcourts.gov PDFs · awaiting human verification flip (text is verbatim; the flip is the review gate)

Rule 12. Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for
Judgment on the Pleadings; Joining Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial
Hearing
(a) Time to Serve a Responsive Pleading.
(1) Generally. Unless another time is specified by rule or statute, the time for serving
a responsive pleading is as follows:

(A) A defendant or third-party defendant must serve an answer or other responsive
pleading:
(i) within 20 days after being served with the summons and complaint, except as
otherwise provided in Rules 4.2(d)(3) and (m); or
(ii) if it has timely waived service under Rule 4(f), within 60 days after the
request for a waiver was sent, or within 90 days after it was sent to the
defendant or third-party defendant outside any judicial district of the United
States.
(B) A party must serve an answer or other pleading responsive to a counterclaim or
crossclaim within 20 days after being served with the pleading that states the
counterclaim or crossclaim.
(C) A party must serve a reply to an answer within 20 days after being served with
an order to reply, unless the order specifies a different time.
(2) Effect of a Motion. Unless the court sets a different time, serving a motion under
this rule alters these periods as follows:
(A) if the court denies the motion or postpones its disposition until trial, the
responsive pleading must be served within 10 days after notice of the court’s
action; or
(B) if the court grants a motion for a more definite statement, the responsive pleading
must be served within 10 days after the more definite statement is served.
(b) How to Present Defenses. Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be
asserted in the responsive pleading if one is required. But a party may assert the
following defenses by motion:
(1) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;
(2) lack of personal jurisdiction;
(3) improper venue;
(4) insufficient process;
(5) insufficient service of process;
(6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and
(7) failure to join a party under Rule 19.
A motion asserting any of these defenses must be made before pleading if a responsive
pleading is allowed. If a pleading sets out a claim for relief that does not require a
responsive pleading, an opposing party may assert at trial any defense to that claim. A
party does not waive a defense or objection by joining it with one or more other
defenses or objections in a responsive pleading or in a motion. A party may assert

improper venue as a defense only if the action cannot be or could not have been
transferred to the proper county under A.R.S. § 12-404.
(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. After the pleadings are closed—but no later
than the date on which dispositive motions must be filed—a party may move for
judgment on the pleadings.
(d) Result of Presenting Matters Outside the Pleadings. If, on a motion under Rule
12(b)(6) or (c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to, and not excluded by, the
court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56. All
parties must be given a reasonable opportunity to present all the material that is
pertinent to the motion.
(e) Motion for a More Definite Statement. If a pleading to which a responsive pleading
is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to
frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before
filing a responsive pleading. The motion must point out the defects complained of and
the details desired. If the court orders a more definite statement and the order is not
obeyed within 10 days after notice of the order or within the time the court sets, the
court may strike the pleading or issue any other appropriate order.
(f) Motion to Strike. The court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any
redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter. The court may act:
(1) on its own; or
(2) on motion made by a party either before responding to the pleading or, if a response
is not allowed, within 20 days after the pleading is served.
(g) Joining Motions.
(1) Right to Join. A motion under this rule may be joined with any other motion
allowed by this rule.
(2) Limitation on Further Motions. Except as provided in Rule 12(h)(2) or (3), a party
who makes a motion under this rule must not make another motion under this rule
raising a defense or objection that was available to the party but omitted from its
earlier motion.
(h) Waiving and Preserving Certain Defenses.
(1) When Some Are Waived. A party waives any defense listed in Rule 12(b)(2)
through (5) by:
(A) omitting it from a motion in the circumstances described in Rule 12(g)(2); or
(B) failing to either:
(i) make it by motion under this rule; or
(ii) include it in a responsive pleading or in an amendment allowed by Rule
15(a)(1) as a matter of course.

(2) When to Raise Others. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted,
to join a person required by Rule 19(b), or to state a legal defense to a claim may
be raised:
(A) in any pleading allowed or ordered under Rule 7;
(B) by a motion under Rule 12(c); or
(C) at trial.
(3) Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction. If the court determines at any time that it
lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.
(i) Preliminary Hearings. If a party so moves, any defense listed in Rule 12(b)(1)
through (7)—whether made in a pleading or by motion—and a motion under Rule 12(c)
must be heard and decided before trial unless the court orders a deferral until trial.
State Bar Committee Note
1966 Amendment to Rule 12(h)
The first paragraph of this subdivision is not in the amended federal rule. Under the
previous rule, numerous federal court decisions had divided on whether, when the party
sees fit to offer a defensive motion, he may thereafter allege the defenses mentioned in this
rule in his answer when he has not included them in his motion. The revised rule adopts
the holding of those cases concluding that the defense is waived in such circumstances.
The rule states that lack of jurisdiction over the person, improper venue, insufficiency of
process, and insufficiency of service of process are waived if (a) a party offers a motion
and (b) does not include them. This re-emphasizes the policy of avoiding piecemeal
decisions.
This does not mean that the party must make a motion. He may leave these defenses to
his answer if he wishes; the requirement of the rule is merely that if he does make a motion,
he must include them all at once. However, the rule further provides that the same defenses
are waived unless included in either a motion or an answer, subject only to amendments as
a matter of course.
This waiver rule applies only to the defenses specified, some defenses being regarded as
too important to be subject to such waiver. These are the defenses of failure to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted; failure to join party who is indispensable under Rule 19;
failure to state a legal defense; and want of jurisdiction over the subject matter. Each can
be subsequently raised.
The amendment does not alter the results of existing Arizona decisions and is in accord
for example with Baxter v. Harrison, 83 Ariz. 354, 321 P.2d 1019 (1958).

Verbatim from the official publication; the only normalization is removal of the publisher's page headers. Verify against the official source for filing-critical use — court publications change without notice.