TrialVector
Workspace
← All rules

C.R.S. § 13-5-143

in review

Judge as party to a case - recusal of judge upon motion.

sha256 ade6967997ad89aabfd2a27e9a9ddcd4… · retrieved 7/18/2026, 7:07:29 PM · Colorado Revised Statutes 2025 — the Office of Legislative Legal Services' own per-title publication (olls.info), '(Uncertified Printouts)' by its own label; the 2025 compilation — the 2026 session (437 laws; general effective date Aug. 12, 2026) is NOT integrated, and the armed overlay says so · awaiting human verification flip (text is verbatim; the flip is the review gate)

13-5-143. Judge as party to a case - recusal of judge upon motion. (1) If a
judge or former judge of a district court is a party in his or her individual and private
capacity in a case that is to be tried within any district court in the same judicial
district in which the judge or former judge is or was a judge of a district court, any
party to the case may file a timely motion requesting that the judge who is
appointed to preside over the case recuse himself or herself from the case.

 (2) If a district court receives a motion filed by a party pursuant to
subsection (1) of this section, the judge who is appointed to preside over the case
shall recuse himself or herself if he or she is a judge of a district court in the same
judicial district in which the judge or former judge who is a party to the case in his or
her individual and private capacity is or was a judge of a district court.

 (3) If a judge recuses himself or herself pursuant to subsection (2) of this
section, the chief justice of the Colorado supreme court or his or her designee shall
appoint a judge from outside the judicial district to preside over the case.

 (4) The provisions of this section shall not apply to a water judge or referee
when he or she is acting within his or her exclusive jurisdiction over water matters
pursuant to section 37-92-203, C.R.S.

 Source: L. 2008: Entire section added, p. 435, § 1, effective August 5.

Verbatim from the official publication; the only normalization is removal of the publisher's page headers. Verify against the official source for filing-critical use — court publications change without notice.