Tex. R. Evid. 1009

Translating a Foreign Language Document

sha256 e36002ea6bf3da1f6fc010bd3b7c5471… · retrieved 8/5/2026, 5:31:42 PM · Supreme Court of Texas official rules PDF — txcourts.gov, verbatim · verified 8/5/2026 by TXEV-1 July reconcile (artifact-proven, dual-sourced)

Rule 1009. 	Translating a Foreign Language Document
(a) 	Submitting a Translation. A translation of a foreign language document is admissible if, at
least 45 days before trial, the proponent serves on all parties:
(1) 	the translation and the underlying foreign language document; and
(2) 	a qualified translator’s affidavit or unsworn declaration that sets forth the translator’s
qualifications and certifies that the translation is accurate.
(b) 	Objection. When objecting to a translation’s accuracy, a party should specifically indicate
its inaccuracies and offer an accurate translation. A party must serve the objection on all
parties at least 15 days before trial.
(c) 	Effect of Failing to Object or Submit a Conflicting Translation. If the underlying foreign
language document is otherwise admissible, the court must admit— and may not allow a party
to attack the accuracy of—a translation submitted under subdivision (a) unless the party has:
 
(1) 	submitted a conflicting translation under subdivision (a); or
(2) 	objected to the translation under subdivision (b).
(d) 	Effect of Objecting or Submitting a Conflicting Translation. If conflicting translations
are submitted under subdivision (a) or an objection is made under subdivision (b), the court
must determine whether there is a genuine issue about the accuracy of a material part of the
translation. If so, the trier of fact must resolve the issue.
(e) 	Qualified Translator May Testify. Except for subdivision (c), this rule does not preclude a
party from offering the testimony of a qualified translator to translate a foreign language
document.
(f) 	Time Limits. On a party’s motion and for good cause, the court may alter this rule’s time
limits.
(g) 	Court-Appointed Translator. If necessary, the court may appoint a qualified translator.
The reasonable value of the translator’s services must be taxed as court costs.

Verbatim from the official publication; the only normalization is removal of the publisher's page headers. Verify against the official source for filing-critical use — court publications change without notice.