Tex. R. Evid. 609

Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction

sha256 27eca6ca3c0df003f8cfc01f64348774… · retrieved 7/15/2026, 8:29:36 PM · Supreme Court of Texas official rules PDF — txcourts.gov, verbatim · verified 8/5/2026 by TXEV-1 July reconcile (artifact-proven, dual-sourced)

Rule 609. Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction
(a) In General. Evidence of a criminal conviction offered to attack a witness’s character for
truthfulness must be admitted if:
(1) the crime was a felony or involved moral turpitude, regardless of punishment;
(2) the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to a party; and
(3) it is elicited from the witness or established by public record.
(b) Limit on Using the Evidence After 10 Years. This subdivision (b) applies if more than
10 years have passed since the witness’s conviction or release from confinement for it,
whichever is later. Evidence of the conviction is admissible only if its probative value,
38
supported by specific facts and circumstances, substantially outweighs its prejudicial
effect.
(c) Effect of a Pardon, Annulment, or Certificate of Rehabilitation. Evidence of a
conviction is not admissible if:
(1) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of
rehabilitation, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding that the person has
been rehabilitated, and the person has not been convicted of a later crime that was
classified as a felony or involved moral turpitude, regardless of punishment;
(2) probation has been satisfactorily completed for the conviction, and the person has
not been convicted of a later crime that was classified as a felony or involved moral
turpitude, regardless of punishment; or
(3) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent
procedure based on a finding of innocence.
(d) Juvenile Adjudications. Evidence of a juvenile adjudication is admissible under this rule
only if:
(1) the witness is a party in a proceeding conducted under title 3 of the Texas Family
Code; or
(2) the United States or Texas Constitution requires that it be admitted.
(e) Pendency of an Appeal. A conviction for which an appeal is pending is not admissible
under this rule.
(f) Notice. Evidence of a witness’s conviction is not admissible under this rule if, after
receiving from the adverse party a timely written request specifying the witness, the
proponent of the conviction fails to provide sufficient written notice of intent to use the
conviction. Notice is sufficient if it provides a fair opportunity to contest the use of such
evidence.

Verbatim from the official publication; the only normalization is removal of the publisher's page headers. Verify against the official source for filing-critical use — court publications change without notice.