Choose your state — coverage is exactly what is loaded and verified
ARIZONA · VERBATIM-OR-ABSENT · FAIL-CLOSED
Arizona civil procedure is unforgiving. Your next move doesn't have to be a guess.
The complete litigation platform: guided case paths, the Discovery War Room, the Rule 26.2 tier calculator, every deadline computed with its citation attached, a verbatim rule corpus reconstructed from the Supreme Court's own orders that attacks its own drafts like opposing counsel, county-by-county court intelligence from the 15-county registry, and attorney routing when your facts get risky.
Legal information, not legal advice. No attorney–client relationship unless separately engaged. Urgent deadline? The Deadline Engine computes it with the citation attached.
of drafts face the Self-Audit Mirror — no exceptions, no opt-out
Arizona authorities — verbatim or absent, hash-pinned
public bench checks on every release — a failing suite is a failing release
deadlines computed by a language model — ever. Pure functions, full citation trace
NO OTHER LITIGATION PLATFORM DARES DO THIS
The Discovery War Room
Every other tool tells you your request is fine. Ours is under standing orders to read it like the other side's senior partner on a bad day — hunting the dragnet phrasing, the missing date bound, the tier budget you just spent. On every draft, every time. The first opposing counsel your discovery ever meets works for you.
of drafts cross-examined
the discovery budget, capped by rule
person in charge of the final word: you
THE MIRROR — LIVE EXAMPLE
Produce any and all documents relating to the project.
⚔ SELF-AUDIT MIRROR — FINDING · HIGH
Overbreadth — “any and all” hands them the objection
“This is the phrase the other side's lawyer reads twice — and in Arizona it spends your capped RFPs. Name the categories: which transactions, which accounts, which communications.”
KEYED AUTHORITY · Ariz. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1) · 26.2 · 34 · the scope record
Deterministic checks — reproducible, never simulated. Legal information, not legal advice.
WATCH THE WAR ROOM WORK
1 · A SUMMONS LANDS
Construction-contract dispute · Maricopa County
Served July 2 by a process server. $412,000 in dispute — superior court, and Rule 26.2 deems it TIER 3 money (30 deposition hours, 240 days, per side). Two entities, one former employee, a vendor with the records that decide it.
TrialVector opens the matter. The 20-day clock is already running — and at 20 days the intermediate weekends COUNT (the under-11-day exclusion never triggers).
WHILE OTHER AI DESCRIBES THE LAW, THIS ONE RUNS THE PROCEDURE
The Arizona arsenal, verbatim
Operative legal text enters the corpus byte-for-byte from official sources and is hash-pinned. A section not loaded does not exist to the engine — and the engine says so instead of guessing. Watch it live-counted on the corpus board.
A.R.S. sections — TEN WHOLE TITLES from azleg.gov, the Legislature's not-official label on every unit's provenance
Rules of Civil Procedure — COURT-promulgated, RECONSTRUCTED from the Supreme Court's own orders; the vendor portal never scraped
the limited-jurisdiction rulebooks whole — justice courts (101–148), evictions, small claims
Constitution sections, verbatim — art. 2, § 31 + art. 18, § 6: damage caps constitutionally FORBIDDEN
the Rule 26.2 tier bands, in the recovered rule's own words — discovery capped BY RULE, per side
the § 12-821.01 notice-of-claim trap — with § 12-821's ONE-YEAR bar stacked behind it
§ 12-2506: joint and several liability ABOLISHED — each defendant pays its allocated share; pure comparative fault rides § 12-2505
counties in the committed local-rules registry — approval-gated by Rule 28.1 (loaded); the Pima + Pinal replacement books
the federal rim — the D. Ariz. local civil rulebook + the CA9 handbook, whole
deadline formulas, every parameter pinned to verbatim text — America/Phoenix, no daylight saving
the ten-trap Civ Pro gauntlet — silence admits TWICE, the 270-day calendar, the mandatory-fee machine
corroboration pins across the engines — the law and the parameters are never allowed to drift apart silently
An Arizona signature is a certificate — Rule 11 orders unsigned papers STRUCK, and § 12-349's fee sanction is mandatory: “shall assess.” TrialVector was built for that world: every export runs the citation gate; the AI-hallucinated authority that ends careers gets flagged before you sign.
Six nuclear engines. One operating system.
Battle-tested across Florida, Texas, and North Carolina — re-keyed to Arizona civil procedure and armed for the tier era.
The Discovery War Room
no other litigation platform dares do this
The proof graph finds the holes an opponent will find. The Self-Audit Mirror reads every draft from the other chair — a request that would flunk TrialVector's own deficiency engine does not serve. And in Arizona every request spends a capped budget, so the Mirror scores the tier spend too.
The Tier Gate + the Escalation Zone
the aggression governor the court itself wrote
Arizona capped discovery BY RULE: three tiers, per side, with the clock running from the Early Meeting. The Escalation Zone governs the aggressive moves against that budget — the 7.1(h) consultation certificate, Rule 26.2(g)'s own overlimit door, and the 10-element record with a named human on it. Build to the line. Never over it.
GOVERN + the Rule Stack
the act date picks the law
Layers of authority resolved per matter and hash-sealed — with Arizona's own wrinkle honored: the rules are COURT-promulgated (art. 6, § 5(5)), reconstructed here from the Supreme Court's own orders, and on procedure the rule outranks a conflicting statute. The 2026 session wave (September 12) sits watched by a committed overlay until reconciled.
The Deadline Engine
the citation rides every date
The 20-day answer with the under-11-day computation twist no other state uses, the Rule 6(c) mail addition, the tier clocks, the 180-day government notice trap with the one-year bar stacked behind it — computed by pure, unit-tested functions in America/Phoenix (no DST) with the trace and the rule attached. A language model never touches a date.
Cite Check AZ + the Integrity Rail
built for the strike-and-shall-assess era
An Arizona signature is a certificate — Rule 11 orders unsigned documents STRUCK, and § 12-349 makes fee sanctions MANDATORY ("shall assess") for claims without substantial justification. Every export runs existence, proposition, temporal, and treatment checks against the corpus — then seals into a hash-chained ledger where editing history breaks the chain visibly. Flagged, never faked.
The Theaters
the tribunal picks the rules — not habit
The anti-SLAPP motion that lives inside § 12-751, the med-mal certification that rides WITH the claim, the RPEA eviction speed track, county-conditional arbitration that asserts no dollar limit, special actions, garnishment — each resolved to its OWN regime with gates and red lines. Plus the appellate shield: the § 12-2108 triple-lesser bond, and an NOA lane honest enough to print no number it cannot pin.
The Traffic Ticket War Room
show the law · educate on options · route the decision
Arizona made ordinary tickets CIVIL — and built a machine around them: the 60-day issuance limit, the DEEMED-ADMITTED trap at the appearance, the 30-day payment clock that reaches the license, the defensive-driving diversion the court SHALL allow, and photo enforcement's signage-and-dismissal architecture. What to do about it stays a decision — yours, or a licensed attorney's.
Served to proof-locked, on the record
Five steps. The first two belong to the engines; the last three are why the record can carry your name.
- 01
GOVERN resolves your forum
County, court, the DEEMED tier with its budget, edition — pinned to your act date and hash-sealed. Two minutes, not two weeks.
- 02
Disclosure first — then the campaign faces the Mirror
The Rule 26.1 statement calendared before the first request; waves 0–5 sequenced against the elements inside the tier budget. Every draft is read from the opponent's chair before it goes anywhere.
- 03
The Tier Gate rules on the aggressive moves
High-pressure tactics export only behind the complete record — and past the caps only through Rule 26.2(g)'s own door, with the 7.1(h) certificate attached.
- 04
Serve, calendar, enforce
Deadline chains with citations attached. Deficiency matrices request by request — an evasive answer IS a failure to answer (37(a)(4)). FILED is unreachable with a fatal block.
- 05
Proof Lock converts discovery into trial ammunition
Admissions ledger (a matter is admitted unless answered — twice over in Arizona), authentication matrix, element map — every proposed fact carries its record cite or it does not export.
CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE
Court intelligence, resolved from the law itself
The county and local-rule layer riding every Arizona surface is resolved from the authorities that create it: one superior court sitting in fifteen counties, the $10,000 justice precincts, and a local-rules layer that exists only through the Supreme Court's own approval machinery (Rule 28.1, loaded) — enumerated from the court's approval-order archive with the honest doctrine that absence from the index is not absence of practice. Each card carries its provenance, because a county's practice is a real constraint but never flattened into law.
Explore the Arizona court map →One superior court, fifteen counties
general civil jurisdiction everywhere; the $10,000 justice-precinct lane below it (§ 22-201)
The 15-county approval-order registry
Rule 28.1-gated — the Pima + Pinal replacement books, the amendment stacks, the vendor portal never scraped
The judge + division layer
coverage by verification — no judge-procedure card renders unverified
The closed loop
- 01Official Arizona authoritystatutes · the order-stack rules · the county registry · the court map
- 02Authority + procedure engineversioned · hash-pinned · human-reviewed · fail-closed
- 03Matter twinparties · claims · deadlines · evidence · docket
- 04Deterministic drafting compilerlocked clauses · calculations · record-bound facts
- 05Adversarial reviewopposing counsel · judge · clerk · privacy · record
- 06Release gates → filing packagecitation certificate · provenance manifest
- 07Outcome intelligencejudge patterns · comparable matters · playbooks
Product law (the non-negotiables)
RUN A REAL MATTER — FREE
Feel the whole desk before you pay a cent.
Founding access is the trial — the entire platform, on your own matter, with no card and no countdown. The free public tools stay free forever. When billing activates, you buy the matter in front of you; until then, the whole war room is open.
- ✓The full Discovery War Room on a real matter
- ✓GOVERN + the campaign engine + Proof Lock
- ✓Every deadline, deficiency matrix, and enforcement step
- ✓The integrity-sealed export ledger
- ✓The pro-se and attorney lanes, both
PRICED LIKE A TOOL, NOT A DEPARTMENT
Buy the matter in front of you.
FOUNDING ACCESS IS OPEN. Every plan is free right now — no card, no trial clock. Go-forward pricing activates when billing does: per-matter for Solo, a flat subscription for Firm. We won't show you a number until the checkout behind it is real — because “honest states, never faked” is the whole product, and that starts at the price.
The Public Tools
The arsenal anyone can fire
- ✓Deadline Engine — the 20-day answer with the under-11-day twist handled, full Rule 6(a) traces, citation attached
- ✓The Tier Calculator — Rule 26.2's own arithmetic, your discovery budget in seconds
- ✓Cite Check AZ — the strike-and-shall-assess sanction-shield record
- ✓The verbatim Arizona corpus + the rule stack
- ✓The War Room mirror, the Escalation Zone, the Theaters — the public tools
No account required. Nothing you enter leaves your browser.
Solo — per matter
Buy the case in front of you — not a subscription
- ✓BenchPath court intelligence (benchpath.ai) — the judge & division layer, available as an add-on
- ✓For individual attorneys AND self-represented (pro se) parties — per matter, not per credential
- ✓The full workspace on one matter: GOVERN, the campaign, Proof Lock
- ✓The Discovery War Room + the lifecycle machine, wired to your docket
- ✓Deadline chains, deficiency matrices, the enforcement lane + the integrity ledger
- ✓Pro se? The parity rails ride along: plain-language surfaces, counsel-review packets on high-risk exports
No subscriptions, no seats, no minimums.
Firm
The whole desk, for the whole firm
- ✓BenchPath court intelligence (benchpath.ai) — the judge & division layer, INCLUDED
- ✓Unlimited matters and up to 25 org seats
- ✓The judicial registry + the attorney-review bridge
- ✓White-label surfaces + the connector roadmap (Clio, DocuSign)
- ✓Priority corpus verification + the drift-sweep feed
- ✓Everything in Solo, across every matter the firm runs
Flat firm subscription. Activates when billing goes live.
Questions litigators actually ask
What is TrialVector Arizona, exactly?+
The fourth state on the TrialVector chassis — the same litigation operating system that runs Florida, Texas, and North Carolina, re-keyed to Arizona civil procedure. It shows official Arizona law verbatim, attacks its own work like opposing counsel, computes every deadline with the citation attached, and proves in an immutable record that a human ruled on every finding. It is software, not a law firm.
Is this legal advice? Do you draft or file anything?+
No, no, and no. TrialVector provides legal information. Arizona draws its line differently than any other state we serve: document preparation for another person is a CERTIFIED activity — Rule 31.3 exempts certified legal document preparers operating in compliance with ACJA § 7-208, and that certification has not been made. So the document assembler here is gated OFF in code: the platform shows the law and the clocks, points at the judiciary's own free forms (the Self-Service Center; AZPOINT for protective orders), and routes drafting to licensed Arizona professionals — and the served flow says exactly why. The signer owns the filing, always.
How much does it cost?+
The public tools — the Deadline Engine, the Tier Calculator, Cite Check, the rule corpus — are free forever. The full per-matter workspace is free during founding access (no card, no clock). When billing activates, it is priced per matter for solo users and as a flat subscription for firms. We show no dollar figure until the checkout behind it is real.
Why won't you just show me a price?+
Because the entire product is built on "honest states, never faked." A corpus section that isn't loaded says so instead of guessing; a citation that isn't verified is flagged, not faked. A price with no live checkout behind it would be the same lie we refuse everywhere else. When billing is real, the number will be too.
What makes the Discovery War Room different?+
Every other tool tells you your request is fine. The War Room's Self-Audit Mirror reads every draft from the opponent's chair — a request that would flunk TrialVector's own deficiency engine does not serve. And Arizona adds a governor no other state has: the tier system caps discovery BY RULE, so the Escalation Zone governs aggression against a budget the court itself wrote — and unlawful conduct never exports at all.
Is the law actually verbatim, or AI-summarized?+
Verbatim or absent. Ten whole titles of the Arizona Revised Statutes enter byte-for-byte from the Legislature's own site (its “not official” label rides every unit), the Constitution whole — and the court rules are RECONSTRUCTED from the Supreme Court's own public orders with a committed, gap-checked ledger, because Arizona hosts its consolidated rules on a vendor portal this platform never scrapes. A model never authors law or a citation. Inspect it yourself on the engine page.
Does it work for self-represented parties, or only attorneys?+
Both — the same analytical engine, enforced by code, not promised. Attack-register vocabulary never reaches a self-represented surface, high-risk exports become counsel-review packets, and the pro-se lane demands the same attestations before anything leaves the door. See Parity & Trust.
Where does the county and local-rule intelligence come from?+
From the official sources themselves. Arizona local rules exist only with Supreme Court approval (Rule 28.1, loaded verbatim), and the committed 15-county registry is enumerated from the court's own approval-order archive — the Pima and Pinal replacement books, the amendment stacks, and the counties with nothing on the index, each stated exactly. Per-county facts stay per-county: the compulsory-arbitration dollar limit is a local-rule fact the platform never asserts globally. See the local-law board and the court map.
What happens to my data?+
The public tools run entirely in your browser — nothing you enter is transmitted. Workspace matters are tenant-isolated, encrypted, and access-audited; the model is never trained on your matter content. Fail-closed never means data-hostage: if an entitlement lapses, existing matters stay readable.