Cross-border discovery

THE UIDDA — NRS 53.100-53.200 (loaded, by its own name)

The statute says it 'may be cited as the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act.' Out-of-state litigants reach Nevada witnesses by submitting the FOREIGN SUBPOENA to the clerk of the court in the county where discovery is sought — the clerk 'shall promptly issue a subpoena for service upon the person' (53.170). No miscellaneous action, no pro hac vice for the request itself. A Nevada case reaches other UIDDA states the mirror way.

NRS 53.100; NRS 53.170

Federal § 1782 (the inbound federal lane)

Foreign proceedings reaching evidence IN the United States run through the federal district courts — the four-element gate plus the Intel discretion factors. The federal doctrine lives in the platform's federal layer; the lane is named here so nobody reinvents it under state law.

28 U.S.C. § 1782 (federal corpus)

The Hague channel (outbound)

Evidence abroad routes through letters of request and the Convention's machinery, with member-state reservations controlling scope — months-scale timing, admissibility planned at drafting. Categorical information only; country-specific law is never stated from memory.

The Evidence Convention (pointer layer)

Tribal sovereignty (the honest boundary)

Tribal courts are sovereign systems, not counties. Service, subpoenas, and enforcement touching tribal land or tribal parties need tribe-specific law this platform does not load — stated plainly, routed always.

doctrine note